Resources


Choosing the Complete Works that’s right for you

 

The Incomplete Works of Shakespeare?

 

It is remarkable to think that since the publication of the 1623 First Folio, none of the vast number of Complete Works currently in and out of print are identical.  That each is unique in terms of its size, shape, and colour is clear, but what may not be as plain are the minor and major textual differences that appear on the pages.  The first thing we must consider, then, when choosing a Complete Works is that we are choosing a carefully-planned collection of plays, sonnets, and narrative poems that is consistent with the goals and procedures set out by the editor.  Secondly, it is important to realise that many of the plays appear in a number of early editions that have many, often substantial, differences in content.  It is the editor’s job to decide which of those texts is most authoritative.  Lastly, it is necessary to take into account that there is some debate as to whether or not Shakespeare had a hand in a given play at all.  It is often debated whether or not to include King Edward III, for instance.  The term complete works, then, is somewhat misleading, and we must take the rather presuming term with a proverbial grain of salt.

  

A Brief History of the Complete Works

Although he did not claim that his edition was ‘complete,’ Nicholas Rowe was the first to use the term ‘works.’  His 1709, 6-volume edition was “[a]dorn’d with cuts, [. . .] [r]evis’d and corrected”.  In this sense, Rowe might be called the first editor of Shakespeare’s plays, although many consider Heminges and Condell, the compilers of the First Folio, to be.  After Rowe, the likes of Alexander Pope, Lewis Theobald, Samuel Johnson, and Edmond Malone, among many others, published their own versions of the works of Shakespeare.  But, it was not until the 20th century when it became fashionable to use the term ‘Complete Works’.  You will find that most volumes on the table below claims that it contains the complete works.  It is up to you to decide which has the most legitimate claim.  Below is a guide to the editions that we sell here in The Shakespeare Bookshop.

 

The Oxford Shakespeare (Second Edition)


A groundbreaking edition, the Oxford Shakespeare (2nd) is the benchmark for all things textual.  Containing plays never before found in a complete works, this edition has redefined the ways in which Shakespeare is edited.  There are no notes, but a companion to the text can be purchased.

The Riverside Shakespeare


The old-standby.  The Riverside is an impressive edition complete with helpful textual notes and a general introduction to Shakespeare.

The Arden Shakespeare


This revised edition is clear and easy to read.  It contains no textual notes, but is textually sound.


The RSC Complete Works


This, the most recent edition, is solely based on the First Folio of 1623.  It contains the narrative poems and sonnets, textual notes, and ample introductions to each of the works.

The Norton Shakespeare
 

The Norton is based on the Oxford Shakespeare.  It is quite often used in universities for teaching purposes because of its ample textual notes and glosses of difficult words.

The Alexander Text
 

If it is a quick-and-dirty, cheap, unannotated edition that you are after, this is the one.  The small print will ensure several trips to the optometrist as the years go by.  The perfect traveller’s edition.

(Matt Kubus)